Chris Bray Final logo

Welcome to my blog of interesting backgammon positions.

 

These will be posted more or less daily and also tweeted. As I add a new position I will give a  commentary for the previous one.

 

Follow me

 

Please leave your comments.

 

Readers are invited to send in their own positions for possible inclusion in Position of the Day to Chris.

2019 - Position 202

By Chris Bray, Nov 2 2019 12:08PM

XGID=---BCcE-BC--c---ab-b-bb---:0:0:1:00:2:6:0:7:10


Match Play. Red trails 2-6 (post- Crawford). Should Red double? If doubled, should White take?


This is posted as a reminder that you can wait too long to double post-Crawford. Red held on the cube too long before doubling. Now, because of the gammon threat, White must drop the double and play from 6-3 ahead. A salutary tale indeed!

6 comments
Nov 2 2019 04:41PM by Leo

Double/pass. Pretty straightforward I'd say.

Nov 2 2019 05:51PM by Peder

I like to try to steal a point at this score. However, it's not easy against an unknown opponent. Theoretically, White should take any double, which is not gammonish or has a zero chance of winning. Red has waited a long time for this, and I think this is a good opportunity to double. Perhaps Red will pass because of gammon fear, but I believe she is still in take territory.

Nov 2 2019 05:54PM by Peder

The last sentence should begin: Perhaps White will...

Nov 3 2019 12:14PM by Peder

There is a simple counter-stategy. If White declares from the start that she is going to take ANY double, Red can never profit by waiting!

Nov 3 2019 08:38PM by Mackenzie

Double/Pass. Personally, I can't imagine entertaining a take from this position. Maybe I am missing something.

Nov 3 2019 08:54PM by Mackenzie

Well, the quiz factor made me curious, so I did a little research. According to an old article on Post-Crawford cubes that I found at www.bkgm.com, "In all odd-away, post crawford positions, the leader can take trailers [sic] cube if he wins at least a fraction of the amount he gets gammoned." The author goes on to state that when 5-away, that fraction is 2/3. From that standpoint, taking would be appear to be correct!

Add a comment
* Required
RSS Feed

Web feed

Position of the Day header thin

 

Twitter